The Electoral College Should be Faithful to its Constitutional Duty by Not Electing Someone Unworthy of Trust

The presidential and vice-presidential Electors should be faithful to the United States Constitution in fulfilling their constitutional duties when they convene and vote on Tuesday. They have been appointed by the State Legislatures, after having been elected by the people, to elect the President and Vice President. In their role as representative of the States and the People, their duty is to exercise their best judgment in good conscience because the U.S. is a federal union that is representative, not democratic, meaning that representatives are chosen to exercise their judgement, instead of people ruling directly. The Electoral College was modeled on the College of Cardinals that elects the Catholic Bishop of Rome and intended by the Framers as a deliberative body of representatives, not as simply a form of proportional proxy voting by the people directly for their preferred candidates. The Electors were originally either appointed or, if elected, were elected directly in their own right, at a time when no one sought election and no names were printed on ballots, instead of under the name of candidates for President and Vice President and when there was not necessarily consensus among members of parties for candidates for both offices. Electors were expected to deliberate and choose which candidates were fit to be entrusted with high office. They should be more faithful to their constitutional role than to their party and its preferred candidates. Therefore, the Electoral College ought not to elect someone, namely Donald Trump, who dodged the military draft in wartime through fraud and never apologized for it, who was convicted of election fraud felonies and remains unrepentant, and who was impeached in the most bipartisan vote and who received the most bipartisan votes for conviction in American history for attempting to overturn his election loss by inciting a mob to insurrection based upon his lies, which delayed the congressional certification of the votes of the Electors, among the most serious examples of many of his poor character that would render him unable to pass even the lowest level of security clearance, without even considering his theft of secret documents and obstruction of the investigation, which earned him some of his numerous federal indictments. His obstruction of the federal probe of the successful foreign interference on behalf of his campaign that he welcomed and accepted, for which the Republican Special Counsel recommended he be impeached, ought to have been reason enough to keep him from any public office. By inciting a mob to violence to thwart the certification of the votes of the Electors, Trump demonstrated his contempt for the Electoral College, the Constitution, and the peaceful transfer of power that renders him unfit to serve as Commander in Chief and to hold the highest office and trust in America, which he betrayed. The Electoral College has been usurped by political parties who have sought to render it no more than a mechanism to prevent candidates from being elected by large States or only from some regions, instead of its intended purpose as a forum for the representatives of the States and People to render their judgment. Trumpist “conservatives” claim to support the Electoral College, but undermine its role when they expect the Electors to suspend their independent judgment and their consciences and instead to act in loyalty to an autocratic party leader around whom his party has established a cult of personality. The role of the Electors is not to submit to a party or a politician, but to be faithful to the Constitution and elect someone worthy of trust to the highest offices in the land that were created under it who can be a faithful steward of representative government and safeguard of liberty.

Foreign Digest: Syria, Romania and Cuba

Syria: The United States conducted a major round of airstrikes against Islamist al-Qaeda and Islamic State terrorists and also Iranian-backed militias in Syria after the tyrannical Assad regime’s fall last week. There are around 900 American troops in northeastern Syria, in the areas held by the Kurds and their allies in the Syrian Democratic Forces to assist against the Islamist terrorists. Israel conducted many raids in Syria, targeting chemical weapons and conventional weapons that pose a threat, destroying much of the Syrian armed forces’ remaining assets. The Turkish-backed Islamists who brought down Assad only control a small part of Syria, although it includes the capital and the three next largest cities. They are ending Syria’s status as a narco-state, having discovered several captagon factories that produce an illicit narcotic I posted about last month. In addition to removing the threat from drug abuse, the effects of the fall of the Assad regime that had oppressed Syrians for more than fifty years are profound for the region and the world. It was the last remaining Ba’ath Socialist party-led State. It will lead to more independence for Lebanon, which Syria had dominated for decades. It makes Israel safer, as it cuts off the Islamic Republic of Iran’s arms supply to Hezbollah, the Lebanese Shi’ite terrorist organization, and to the Mediterranean. And it deprives Russia of a key ally and undermines the Russian image as a strong and reliable ally, just as its failure to protect Armenia had suggested. The fall of Assad validated American and allied support for Ukraine, which weakened Russia, and U.S. support for Israel, which weakened Hezbollah and Iran, thereby reducing the threat from the two rogue States and their allies. It also proved the effectiveness of U.S. and allies' economic sanctions, that also weakened the regime. The Iranian and Russian support for Assad and the tyrant’s targeting bombing of civilians and his use of chemical weapons against them had caused millions of Syrians to flee, some of whom are already beginning to return. Moreover, the fall of yet another dictator, especially one that seemed secure for the last few years after appearing to have won the Syrian Civil War, gives hope to oppressed peoples around the world. Meanwhile, the U.S. indicted for torture and visa fraud the head of Syrian prisons who has resided in South Carolina since 2020. He had led Syria’s prisons from 2005 to 2008. It is hoped that that other Syrians responsible for atrocities and torture will be brought to justice, and that Syria will be peaceful, free, representative and inclusive of all ethnic and religious minorities, and prosperous, and no longer a military, terrorist or narcotics threat to its neighbors. Romania: After the Romanian parliamentary elections earlier this month, the pro-Western parties agreed to form a coalition government, including conservatives, to keep the far-right pro-Russian parties out of power. The ruling center-left party, which had received the most votes, the two main center-right parties (one Christian democrat and the other reformist), and a party that represents ethnic Hungarians, will comprise the grand coalition of pro-European parties. They also agreed to back a pro-European presidential candidate versus far-right pro-Russian parties in elections that will be rescheduled early next year after the results of the first round were annulled because of heavy Russian interference. As I had posted, a little-known far-right pro-Russian candidate with no party who had not made any campaign expenditures came in first. The candidate of the reformist center-right party came second. Cuba: The U.S. is keeping Cuba on the list of state sponsors of terrorism for harboring Colombian terrorists.

The Fall of the Ba’athist Terrorist-Sponsoring Tyrannical Assad Regime in Syria

I have been posting about the tyrannical, terrorist-sponsoring regime of Bashar Assad from early on since I launched this blog, especially since the popular uprising against his dictatorship began in 2011, as part of the Arab Spring. Syrians had been inspired by the movement across the Arab world for liberty and representative government, which was inspired to a significant degree by the Liberation of Iraq of the fellow Ba’athist regime of Saddam Hussein and the replacement of his brutal autocracy with a constitutional parliamentary republic with broad representation. I had remembered in my childhood how his father Hafez Assad’s regime, which had come to power in 1970, had put down a rebellion by shelling Homs and Hama, killing tens of thousands of civilians in 1982. I have been concerned how Syria, as Iran’s only Arab ally, was a conduit for Iranian arms to the Lebanese Shi’ite terrorist organization, Hezbollah and how Assad had undermined the United States in the War on Terrorism in Iraq by sending jihadists into it, although they were among those defeated by the American-led coalition. With the opposition to Assad from various ethnic, religious and political groups in Syria, it appeared that his regime might fall by the mid-2010s, despite support from Iran and Hezbollah and Assad’s brutality, which included targeting civilians with chemical weapons. But the support of Russia, which has a naval base in Syria, proved critical and propped the regime. Instead of focusing on targeting Islamist terrorists, like al-Qaeda and its offshoot, the Islamic State, as Russia had announced it would, the Russians and Assad focused their firepower on freedom-loving opponents and deliberately struck civilian residential areas and even hospitals and first responders. All the while, in addition to the usual far-left isolationists, far-right isolationists in the West opposed overthrowing Assad, claiming that supporting his non-Islamist opponents was supporting “terrorists,” like Assad and Russia claimed. The U.S. maintained sanctions on the regime and had backed the Kurdish-dominated Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), which at least allowed the Kurds to exercise autonomy in their part of Syria, but they were abandoned by the Trump Administration and there was little subsequent international effort to free Syria, despite its sponsorship of terrorism. It appeared that Assad had won the 14-year Civil War that killed a half million people and displaced millions, except for failing to regain control over the Kurdish and Turkish-backed areas and a few areas held by Islamists, as fighting had decreased sharply over the last eight years, with little movement of the battlelines and Western focus mostly on the Islamist terrorists. The war had major global implications, as it gave rise to the Islamic State, which took advantage of the power vacuum and declared a caliphate with its capital in Syria before being destroyed by an American-led coalition, while the record 5 million external refugees provoked an anti-migrant backlash in Europe and the rise of right-wing authoritarian nationalists. Even while Syrian allies were being weakened, as Israel continued to devastate Hezbollah in Lebanon and Syrian and Iranian forces in Syria and even in Iran, and while Ukraine was weakening Russia by defending itself against Russian aggression, the Assad regime appeared stable outwardly. I nevertheless continued to post about Syria, both about anti-terrorism strikes by the U.S. and Israel, but also to remind readers about the regime’s tyranny and threat from its terrorism sponsorship and its alliance with Iran and Russia, in the hope of encouraging the overthrow of the Assad regime. I had last posted November 17 about Syria’s manufacturing of an illicit narcotic, captagon that funds the Assad regime and Hezbollah. I was planning another post about another round of U.S. strikes in Syria against an Iranian-backed militia in Syria. But starting on November 27, in a stunning 11-day blitz, a Turkish-backed coalition of Islamist and allied rebels began a drive simply to push back on Syrian regime forces who were shelling rebel-held towns in northwestern Syria. Assad’s troops put up little resistance while Russia bombed civilians, which was ineffective in stopping the rebel advance that turned into a major assault against the heart of the Ba’athist regime. While other rebels, including the SDF and ordinary Syrians rose up across Syria, the Turkish-backed forces drove into the Syrian capital, putting an end to the Assad regime after 54 years of oppression, with Bashar Assad fleeing to Russia. Although the takeover from the Assad regime of the Syrian government apparatus by Islamists is concerning, the end of the tyranny of the last remaining Ba’ath socialist party Arab government is good for Syria and the region in many ways and of such significance that I will post additional observations. It is glorious that Syrians have been liberated from a despotic regime after 54 years of oppression, and worth celebration that Hezbollah, Iran and Russia are deprived of a major ally.

Foreign Digest: Romania, Georgia, Russia, Cyprus, and Afghanistan

Romania: In a dramatic two weeks, there was a presidential election in Romania, followed by a parliamentary election, and then the annulment of the presidential election because of heavy Russian interference. In the presidential election two weeks ago, a little-known far-right fascist-sympathizing pro-Russian candidate with no party or platform came in first, thanks to Russian interference through a social media campaign. The Romanian authorities asked for a recount and a European Union investigation into the Chinese social media platform and blamed Russia. The President of Romania then declassified information and submitted it to the Supreme Court, which annulled the election in an unprecedented move to undo Russian interference that was sufficient to alter the election and thus render the results fraudulent. A reformist center-right party’s candidate came in second, edging out the ruling center-left Prime Minister and would thus have advanced to the run-off election between the top two candidates scheduled for today. Instead, a new election will be scheduled. The President of Romania is responsible for defense and foreign policy and appointments, while the Prime Minister leads the government. Meanwhile, last week in the parliamentary elections, the outcome of which will determine who will be the Prime Minister, the ruling center-left Premier’s party had the most votes of any individual party, while a Christian democratic party came in third and the center-right party whose presidential nominee came in second, did well, but three far-right parties combined for the largest amount of votes, including one that came in second overall, with none of these parties coming close to a majority, as various ethnic and other parties attracting many votes. None of these main parties ran together as a bloc, but even if they had, no coalition would have received a majority of votes and seats. Therefore, a coalition will have to be formed. Georgia: There were protests in Abkhazia against commercial measures adopted by the breakaway Russian puppet-state regarded as too favorable to Russia and thus undermining Abkhazia’s independence. Russia had invaded the former Soviet Republic of Georgia in 2008 and seized separatist Abkhazia and South Ossetia and then recognized their independence. But the largest protests in Georgia have been by Georgians against the ruling pro-Russian party after last month’s fraudulent election in which Russia heavily interfered, giving the oligarch-founded party a narrow win. The Georgian Government announced that it was suspending the application process for European Union membership, after the Prime Minister had promised to continue the application process. His government is trying to repress the protests with brute force and arrests of opposition figures. Russia: The McCain Prize was awarded to Russian freedom advocate Vladimir Kara-Murza for his advocacy for human rights in Russia. He was recently freed by the tyrannical regime of Vladimir Putin in a prisoner swap with the West and exiled. The prize for human rights advocacy is named for former United States Senator John McCain of Arizona, who had been tortured as a prisoner of war by the Communist Vietnamese during the Vietnamese War. Cyprus: Cyprus announced its intent to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, in a marked shift from its closeness with Russia, which is viewed with trepidation because of its imperialism, as Putin seeks to restore the Soviet Union/Russian Empire. The U.S. approves Cyprus’ plan. Finland and Sweden abandoned their longtime neutrality to join NATO, the U.S.-led defensive pact, for the same reason. Afghanistan: There have been more frequent and lethal resistance attacks in Afghanistan against the Taliban militia that is the de facto ruler of the Central Asian State. There are now three armed resistance organizations in Afghanistan. In addition to the National Resistance Front (NRF), which operates in and around the Panjshir Vally, led by the son of the leading anti-Soviet guerilla commander and the former Vice President of Afghanistan before the Taliban militia takeover in 2021, which I have posted about, and a smaller force, a new force led by the most senior General in the Afghan armed forces has entered the fight. It maintains friendly relations with the NRF. It operates mostly in Kabul, where the NRF occasionally raids, while the NRF mostly operates in provinces north of Kabul. The Taliban, who had hosted the Islamist al-Qeada terrorists responsible for the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks on America that killed three thousand people, returned to power in 2021 after the U.S. and an inernational coalition and Afghan allies had overthrown them in 2002, but then abandoned Afghanistan, leaving its allied government to fall. No State in the world recognizes the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan, but no State has backed the resistance. The Islamist Taliban again are repressive and maintain their cloes ties to terrorists.

Update on the 2024 General Election in America

Now that most of the results of the 2024 General Election in America have been certified, some additional observations can be made from those I had posted last month. There was not a majority of votes for the Trump-Vance/Republican United States presidential Electors and there were no coattails for Donald Trump. Although Republicans gained 4 seats in the Senate to regain the majority, partly from picking up open seats in GOP-leaning States, the ruling Republicans suffered a net loss of one seat in the House of Representatives, as each party flipped a handful of seats from the other party. The Trumpist Republican U.S. Senatorial candidate in Arizona, who had been a frequent candidate for statewide office and denied the results of her and Trump’s 2020 general election loss, was rejected by the voters. Thus, there was no popular mandate for Trump or Trumpism, only, as I had posted, the exploitation and exaggeration of grievances based on populist appeals and even demagoguery based on xenophobia, conducted with false or misleading statements by Trump and his supporters and amplified by continued Russian interference that had already altered public opinion. The overtly populist Republican presidential campaign for protectionism, nativism and isolationism marked a sharp transition away from the GOP’s conservative messaging of the last four decades. Although there was some relatively more conservative messaging in congressional races, even those federal elections were influenced heavily by populism. It is even clearer now that more center-right organizations, whether political action committees, caucuses, or even a new political party are necessary for conservatism to compete with and even prevail over far-right populism, as voters in many foreign States, particularly with parliamentary systems allow for such an alternative choice, which is attractive to the electorate, as I have posted. One other noteworthy aspect of the election of interest to conservatives is that while pro-abortion Democratic candidates did not fare as well as they had hoped, nearly every pro-life Democratic candidate was elected, in contrast to less success for pro-abortion Democrats.

Happy Thanksgiving! 16th Anniversary of this Blog, Blog Visit Report

Happy Thanksgiving! On this day, Americans are called by the United States and by each State in the Union, as they have since President George Washington first instituted the federal holiday, to give thanks to God for their blessings. The holiday was inspired by the thanksgiving meal celebrated by the English Puritan colonists in Massachusetts in the Seventeenth Century for the bounty they were able to enjoy thanks to their friendship with the Indigenous Americans, who taught them vital agricultural skills, after a period of famine. Americans thank God for their many personal blessings, both spiritual and material, as well as for their liberty and representative government. This year, we particularly can be thankful for the Constitution and its system of checks and balances, upon which we shall become reliant again in the new year. One particular blessing of liberty to be thankful for is the freedom of the printing press, which can now be exercised with technology electronically, as on this blog, which allows ordinary citizens to act as journalists and to engage in discourse in an electronic form of printing that can be published through the Internet. It was 16 years ago that I launched this blog with these goals, and over 1,500 posts later, I am grateful to be able to continue, at a time when there is a great need. Alas, the glitch that prevents indentation and line spacing continues, but I try to work around it to share important information and my perspective as a historian, former party and elected official, and public servant. But I am pleased that according to the blog host, Blogger, there continue to be thousands of visits each month to this blog from America and around the world. Thank you for visiting. Please visit regularly to stay updated.

The Center-Right Resurgence Around the World

Conservatives, who are on the center-right part of the political spectrum, lead many governments around the world, as usual, especially in Europe, including the European Union, and in Latin America, as well as other States around the world. But even with a surge of support for the authoritarian far right and a trend toward populists and authoritarians around the globe, and a few conservative parties have included the far right in their governing coalitions, the center right has been resurgent lately against both extremes. A center-right party defeated the authoritarian far-right in Poland earlier this year. The center right leads governments in Austria and France that kept both the anti-migrant far right and the left from power, despite electoral gains by both extremes in parliamentary elections. In other States, center-right parties are at least part of a governing coalition, usually as the main junior partner. The leading center-right party and other allied conservatives joined a governing coalition with the ruling leftists for the first time since the mid-1990s in South Africa, which kept Marxists out of power. In Italy, the center-right party keeps the governing right-wing coalition anchored to its pro-European, pro-American roots versus anti-migrant nationalism and appeasement of Russian imperialism. Even where conservatives have been unsuccessful in elections because of fraud by authoritarian regimes, their center-right parties appeal most to voters. The opposition coalition in Venezuela that won the presidential elections for which the ruling Socialist dictatorship refuses to accept the results, is led by the center right and a center-right party has emerged as the leading opposition party against the unpopular autocratic anti-migrant party in Hungary. Just as conservatism is appealing to voters and capable of governing abroad, the center right can be resurgent in America again versus both the Trumpist (populist and xenophobic protectionism, nativism and isolationism, with authoritarianism) far right and the left. Voters around the world prefer conservatism versus these radical poles, based on equality, liberty and representative government, especially when it delivers honest government that is fiscally responsible and is dynamic enough to offer reforms for current problems. The center-right resurgence around the globe suggests that similar American conservative parties and candidates who expressly reject far-right Trumpism should also be appealing to American voters. Candidates, whether from major or minor political parties of independent, who are from the center right can appeal more broadly to the electorate than those from the radical poles. Electoral coalitions based on a shared platform of common principles or even parliamentary-style power-sharing agreements might also be favored by voters opposed to both the far left and far right and who prefer a clear and safer choice.

International Observers’ Report on the 2024 General Election in America

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in Europe sends election observers to America, as per reciprocal agreements between the United States and foreign States. The 2024 General Election across America “demonstrated the resilience of the country’s democratic institutions,” followed “a well-run process” and proceeded in a generally “peaceful and orderly atmosphere,” the OECD’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights said in its initial report released the day after. But the vote “was marked by disinformation and instances of violence, including harsh and intolerant language against women and immigrants by one candidate,” the delegation warned, while “claims by Mr. Trump of widespread electoral fraud in the 2020 elections, dismissed by state and federal courts, have eroded public trust in democratic processes.” The OECD’s International Election Observer Mission observers went on to observe “incidents of election violence, including . . . threats of violence or aggressive behavior targeting voters, including minorities, election administrators, officials, campaigners, and media representatives.” The leader of the mission, a historian, noted a decline in civility and return to the harsh and violent politics typical before the early Twentieth Century. The harsher, more violent and more personal rhetoric not only polarizes society extremely, but “that polarization is something which makes ordinary governing very difficult in most countries if it happens," he said. I note how this polarization, which is exacerbated by campaign marketing messages that foster fear and anger about the other side to justify support for their candidates and to increase turnout of their own base of voters, instead of trying to persuade voters to their side through reason. This polarization makes voters vulnerable to the populism, demagoguery and foreign interference in the form of disinformation that I have noted have been influencing recent elections in America.

Update on Syria: Drug Production; U.S. and Israel Strikes against Terrorists

Drug Production: The United States recently sanctioned some Syrians for the production and trafficking of the drug captagon, an illicit amphetamine-like drug, most of the production of which is in Syria, mostly by the Syrian regime itself. Captagon abuse props up the regime of tyrant Bashar Assad with billions of dollars’ worth of drug sales and funds militants and terrorists. There is also some production in Lebanon, after it had moved to a Hezbollah stronghold there from Europe after it had been banned, after having been developed for health purposes. Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed Lebanese Shi’ite terrorist organization that has been defending the Assad regime in the Syrian Civil War, is complicit in the trafficking of the drug. Captagon is a threat to stability in neighboring Jordan, where it and other drugs are smuggled across the border from Syria. Jordan deploys a third of its army there in anti-smuggling operations. There was a Jordanian airstrikes on Syria several months ago, supported by American arms and training. Saudi Arabia and Iraq also have implemented policies against the drug. Syria was readmitted to the Arab League last year and Jordan and other Arab States diplomatically recognized the Assad regime, in exchange for a promise to crack down on the drug, which Syria has broken. Western Europe is a major market for captagon. U.S. and Israeli Strikes on Terrorists: The United States struck Islamist terrorists in Syria again recently. It has continued to strike against the Islamic State, the offshoot of al-Qaeda, which was responsible for the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks on America, the deadliest in history, as well as against Iranian-backed terrorists. Meanwhile, Israel also continues to strike Iranian-backed terrorists based in Syria, including the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

Measles Cases Rise 20% Globally as Vaccination Rates Have Dropped

The number of cases of measles globally increased 20% worldwide from 2022 to 2023 to over 10 million with over 100,000 deaths, while the number of countries with cases rose from 36 to 57, with an increase in every region of the world, according to the Centers for Disease Control. Vaccine use declined from 86% in 2019 to 83% last year, with represents a slight recovery from pandemic-era lows. Around three million lives per year were saved in the prior two decades of increased global immunization rates that had drastically reduced the number of cases and deaths globally. The pandemic and certain security challenges in some countries are factors, as is vaccine hesitancy because of baseless fears about vaccine safety. I had posted earlier this month about the rise of pertussis in America because of the rise of vaccine hesitancy in America. Vaccine hesitancy has increased in America, as it has in Europe, because of debunked conspiracy theories on the far left and far right about vaccine safety and effectiveness that are contrary to abundant scientific studies, libertarian opposition to vaccine mandates, and Russian disinformation about vaccines to weaken America and Europe, where there have also been outbreaks of contagious and deadly diseases that are preventable with safe and effective vaccines. Donald Trump, whose campaign was again helped by Russian interference, has announced his intention to nominate a leftwing, pro-abortion anti-vax Democrat, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who believes in various conspiracy theories, as Secretary of Health and Human Services. American conservatives should defend public health and support moral responsibility by asking their Senators to oppose this nomination.

Center Right Account Launched on Bluesky

I have launched a social media account on Bluesky, the social media platform created by the same creator of Twitter (now "X," which was taken over by a Trumpist emerging oligarch), called The Center Right: https://bsky.app/profile/thecenterright.bsky.social. It will be the new social media home of the center right, versus both lliberalism and far right Trumpism (protectionism, nativism, isolationism and authoritarianism). The center right stands for equality, liberty, representative government and the Constitution and for traditional conservative principles, such as the free market, free trade, fiscal conservatism, virtue, a strong defense and American leadership in the world. The center right must stand on its own and can no longer rely only on trying to work within the Republican Party or on the liberal Democrats. It must form its own organizations, factions or even political party, while working with anyone to advance conservative goals.

Foreign Digest: Moldova and Georgia

Moldova: The pro-Western President of Moldova was reelected over the pro-Russian Socialist candidate in the presidential runoff election November 3. Moldova is a former Soviet Republic in which the Russian Federation stations troops against Moldova’s wishes along the border with Ukraine in a secessionist Russian-speaking area. Moldovans had approved a referendum last month to join the European Union, as I had posted. Like most Georgians and Ukrainians, they prefer integration with the West, instead of being forced into the orbit of Russia. Georgia: There were mass protests last week by Georgians against the Russian-influenced election last month, in which the pro-Russian Government claims reelection amidst widespread claims of fraud. The pro-Western President also claimed the results were fraudulent. A coalition of centrist and center-left pro-European opposition parties vows not to recognize the illegitimate results and will not take its seats in Parliament. A pro-Western and anti-Russian center-right coalition of parties is asking Western governments not to recognize the result. The opposition in general is advocating for a new election under international supervision and an investigation of last month’s election. The Russian Federation had invaded the former Soviet Republic of Georgia in 2008, seizing two breakaway territories and establishing puppet-states that claimed independence that are only recognized by Russia and a handful of its allies. Russian tyrant Vladimir Putin, an ex-Soviet intelligence officer, is trying to restore the Soviet Union and the Russian Empire.

Pertussis Cases Have Quintupled in America

The number of pertussis cases across America has increased five-fold over last year, according to the Centers for Disease Control. I had posted in September that the cases in Pennsylvania in particular had increased tenfold over the previous period. Pertussis, also known as “whooping cough,” is a deadly virus that had nearly been eradicated in America by widespread vaccination, but, like measles and other preventable diseases, has increased around the world, including in Europe and America because of increased vaccine hesitancy. Vaccines are safe and effective, having prevented countless cases, hospitalizations and deaths from various contagious diseases with little serious side effects, according to numerous scientific studies, but unscientific disbelief about their safety and opposition to vaccine mandates has spread among the far left, the far right and libertarians, amplified by Russian disinformation. Because not everyone’s immune system responds to vaccines, it is vital that enough other people are vaccinated to protect the few who cannot be, a concept known as “herd immunity.” Therefore, it is a Christian and conservative belief that vaccination is a moral duty of every citizen who can be vaccinated to protect everyone else, especially those who cannot be vaccinated.

Initial Conservative Thoughts on the 2024 General Election across the American Union

There were few consolations for true (non-Trumpist) conservatives in the 2024 General Election across America, between the Trumpification of the Republican Party and the center-right again having abandoned the field to the liberal Democrats to force a binary choice against the demagogic, dishonest, corrupt, disloyal, authoritarian and cruel Donald Trump and Trumpism (protectionism, isolationism, nativisim). I shall soon express thoughts in another post on how the center right must stand on its own henceforth, as it does successfully in many States around the world, but this post will be about the few consolations from the initial election results. As usual, I only post about decisive results before all the results have been certified, as the votes continue to be counted and, in the case of the offices of President and Vice President of the United States, though the expected results are not in doubt, the election will not have taken place yet until the Electoral College votes next month. In the federal elections, among only a few others, there were two center-right candidates who have been elected in significant contests. Representative Dan Newhouse of Washington defeated a Trumpist Republican challenger and John Curtis of Utah was elected to the Senate to succeed Mitt Romney. Newhouse and Republican Representative Dan Valadao of California, who was also reelected, both had voted in favor of the second impeachment of Trump for attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election and inciting insurrectionists to attack the Capitol on January 6, 2021 to thwart the certification of the results based on Trump’s lies. Curtis neither endorsed, nor was endorsed by Trump. Two Democratic candidates who were prominent in Trump’s first impeachment for extorting Ukraine to smear his opponent with a baseless criminal investigation by holding up military aid to defend it against Russia under Vladimir Putin, the tyrannical ex-Soviet intelligence officer trying to restore the Soviet Union, were elected. One, the Ukrainian-born National Security anti-Putin officer who blew the whistle on Trump and who was backed by anti-Trump conservatives, was elected to the U.S. House from Maryland and the other, an impeachment manager whom the Trumpist Republican-majority had censored, to the Senate from California. Although they are Democrats, their defeat by Trumpist Republicans would have been interpreted as some kind of repudiation, instead of a validation. It was a small blow to Putin, who otherwise was successful again in backing Trump with propaganda and disinformation that has shifted public opinion since he began his “active measures campaign” in 2014 to promote his imperialist policy, divide Americans, undermine confidence in elections and the truth and to back Trump, who has been more favorable to Putin than even his liberal Democratic opponents. Additionally, there were myriad deceptions by Trump and his supporters that fraudulently swayed voters on every issue, such as the successful Russian interference on behalf of Trump in the 2016 Election, the validity of Trump’s 2020 Election loss, and about his criminal and civil cases, his opponents, migrants, inflation, etc. The Trumpists’ allegations of fraud against them in this election were obviously rebutted by the vote totals in their favor that will be certified by election officials and that their opponents have conceded. On referendums, the results were mostly unsuccessful for conservatives, despite the Republicans’ overall success. Marijuana legalization failed in Florida, South Dakota and North Dakota, and a pro-abortion referendum failed in Florida, unlike in four other States, but the successes in the Sunshine State were only because of a 60% threshold for approval. I shall post about any other significant results as the vote-counting is completed and on some problems in the elections identified by international observers, as well as my thoughts on the direction forward against both the left and the Trumpist far right.

Additional Conservative Thoughts on the 2024 United States Presidential Election

I posted yesterday about the many Republicans and conservatives opposing the United States presidential candidacy of Donald Trump, and how Trump’s poor character disqualifies him from office and how his narcissism, misogyny, cruelty, corruption, authoritarianism, and disloyalty affected his term in office and would again if he were reelected. These posts were only the latest of my posts about the dangers of Trump and Trumpism (a populist mix of protectionism, isolationism and nativism) and of Russian tyrant Vladimir Putin, the ex-Soviet intelligence officer who is continuing to interfere in the American election to support Trump, divide Americans and undermine confidence in the truth and in elections. But because there are many other thoughts worthy of consideration, this post will be a catchall for a few of the most relevant. One additional item I did not include in my lengthy post yesterday about Trump’s character is how his self-interest in his reelection, for reasons of ego, business interest and fear of prosecution for crimes, caused him to fail to address adequately the Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic and even to minimize it, which caused millions more Americans to become ill, hospitalized or die, with many more still suffering its long-term effects, than would have otherwise. His attitude encouraged skepticism of science-based public health policy and vaccine hesitancy, which has continued to cause harmful effects. Another thought about character is how this election pits a career prosecutor against a convicted felon, which is yet another example of what I have been posting about how Trumpist Republicans and “conservatives” have forfeited character, which is the most fundamental matter, as a political campaign issue. They keep trying to cast aspersion on Democrats and liberals while claiming Trump’s poor character is irrelevant to the highest trust in the land. Although both major party tickets include vice presidential nominees with military service, in contrast to Trump having dodged the draft through fraud, the Republican nominee denigrated his own service and that of his fellow servicemembers by falsely claiming his combat service was based on lies, which is an example of ignorant and foolish Trumpist isolationism. As I have noted, the Liberation of Iraq overthrew a brutal tyrant who was a serial aggressor and sponsor of terrorism who was violating the ceasefire and United Nations resolutions against Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. As a result of the service of our troops and those of our allies, Iraq is no longer a conventional, WMD or terrorist threat, but an ally in the War on Terrorism, as thousands of chemical weapons were found and destroyed, as well as the banned chemicals to make more, and the terrorists were defeated in what became a critical battlefield of the War. In contrast, Trump legitimized the Islamist Taliban militia who had harbored al-Qaeda (the Islamist terrorist organization responsible for the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks on America that killed a record 3,000 people), undermined our ally, the Afghan Government, and signed a deal with the terrorists that hamstrung his successor that led to a disastrous withdrawal from and abandonment of Afghanistan. The current Administration has otherwise continued the fight against various terrorists, while Trump has ignored foreign threats from dictators he admires and wants to make deals with to appease, which would only encourage their aggressiveness more. It is this last point that is most worth concluding this post about. Trump, whose business in America had been bolstered disproportionately by Russians and who had tried for decades to do open hotels in Russia, accepted Russian interference on his behalf and then denied it, against the conclusion of U.S. intelligence agencies, the Republican Special Counsel and the GOP-led Senate Intelligence Committee, even though some of the Russian interference was overt (the propaganda from Russian state-controlled media outlets in America) because he could not admit that his election was illegitimate and owed to a hostile foreign dictator. In addition to Trump being unable ever to criticize Putin because the tycoon admires Putin and wants to do business with him, he delayed sanctions on Russia, implemented them only at the deadline, and withheld military aid to Ukraine while Russian-backed separatists made gains. And after leaving office, his opposition to critically needed military aid to Ukraine caused its delay for months while the American ally was under full-scale Russian aggression. Moreover, Trump’s denial of Russian interference, which helps Russia’s goal of hiding its efforts, allows it to continue to interfere on behalf of Trump’s candidacy and thus to violate American independence. American voters should reject the interference of hostile foreign powers like Putin and exercise a free choice of leaders who are loyal to America and its ideals of equality, liberty and representative government.

The 2024 General Election in Pennsylvania and across America

The 2024 General Election in Pennsylvania and across America will be held on Tuesday, November 5. On the ballot are the federal offices of presidential Electors, each of the seats for the United States House of Representatives, and a third of the seats of the Senate, as well as many State offices, including Governor in some States and other statewide offices, legislative offices and other offices. In Pennsylvania, the office of Governor is not on the ballot, but the statewide offices of Attorney General, Treasurer and Auditor General, as well as every seat in the House of Representatives and half the seats in the Senate. In some of these contests, there are non-Trumpist Republican candidates who believe in the GOP’s conservative principles and not the populist mix of protectionism, isolationism, nativisim, authoritarianism, cruelty and corruption of Trumpism. In one unusual race, non-Trumpist Republican incumbent U.S. Representative Dan Newhouse of Washington is facing a general election challenge from a Trumpist Republican candidate endorsed by Donald Trump. Conservative voters should consider voting for Newhouse and other non-Trumpist Republican or independent or third-party candidates on the ballot versus liberal Democrats. If there are no such true center-right candidates’ names on the ballot, or if the Democratic nominees are not acceptably moderate or at least pro-life, then write in the names of qualified Republican or conservative candidates, instead of accepting any Trumpist as worthy of votes, especially any who have failed to oppose Trump publicly. As I have posted, Trump and Trumpism are a cancer on the conservative movement and a mortal threat to the Republican Party. The only way to save the movement and the party that is its vehicle is to purge Trump and Trumpism completely, instead of accepting and thus encouraging the binary choices of unacceptable candidates that the major political parties try to force on the electorate. Voting for the “lesser of two evils” is voting for evil, instead of exercising the choice to vote for good. In addition to elective offices, there are ballot questions of interest to conservatives across the Union.

Donald Trump Fails the Most Important Test: Character

The most important test for any candidate for elective office is character, and the higher the level of trust in the office, the more important good character is. As I have observed firsthand in my service as both an elected and appointed policymaker, only those of good character can be trusted to put the interest of the people above their own. Most conservatives in America have abandoned this principle, along with nearly every other conservative principle, but there are many of us who continue to stand for good character as essential. Donald Trump’s poor character is the root of his lack of understanding of the Constitution and what truly makes America great, and his general lack of principles. His character deficit resulted in bad practices and policies in his four years in the presidency and will cause even worse consequences if he were returned to office, without him having subordinates around him loyal to the Constitution over him, with broad immunity from criminal prosecution granted by the Supreme Court, and without again facing accountability from the voters because of the two-term limit. That Trump dodged the military draft through fraud during the Cold War is sufficiently disqualifying alone because it demonstrates that when America needed him to serve, he failed to do his duty because of cowardice, a lack of patriotism, and selfishness. But the litany of other examples of his lack of good character proves this example not to be in isolation and that Trump is untrustworthy, which is why he could not even pass the lowest level of federal security clearance. He denigrated prisoners of war and minimized the suffering of soldiers and veterans from post-traumatic stress disorder. In office, Trump used the military as political props and sent them on political assignments. After lying during his 2016 that he was not continuing to do business with Russia, and then asking for and accepting election interference from that hostile foreign power on his behalf, and amplifying Russian propaganda and disinformation, he acted in ways favorable to Russian tyrant Vladimir Putin, including trying to extort Ukraine to smear his leading political opponent with a baseless allegation by holding up defensive aid against Russia. Trump held up military aid against Russian aggression last year and favors appeasement of Russia, with which he has long had business interests. In addition to influencing his foreign policy, his financial self-interest was proven when his foundation was terminated because of fraud and his business found liable for fraud, and his inauguration committee forced to reimburse the public for overcharging. In office, his greed caused him to charge the Secret Service, which was only one example of constitutionally prohibited domestic emoluments, and even overcharge them, for protecting him. Trump violated the marriage vows he made with each of his three wives, which is why it was predictable that he would be unable to keep his oath of office, which he did by violating the Emoluments Clause and trying to overturn the legitimate results of an election to stay in power. In addition to adultery, he operated a strip club, denigrated women who pledge to practice chastity, boasted of sexual assault, and was found liable for sexual assault and defamation of the victim. Trump’s misogyny, along with his authoritarianism, has undermined the pro-life cause, instead of promoting it based on love and freedom. His authoritarianism violated the freedom of refugees seeking asylum from persecution, diminished the right of the public to know what financial conflicts of interest he had and what foreign influence there was on him in terms of debts or income (i.e. constitutionally prohibited foreign emoluments), and had a chilling effect on the freedom of expression by business leaders, among other violations of liberty. Trump’s authoritarian proclivities and fondness for foreign dictators increased oppression around the world as the United States forfeited its leadership for freedom and instead became a model of authoritarianism. The bigotry he exhibited as a businessman has led him to cruelty toward refugees and demagoguery against migrants. Trump’s narcissism leaves him vulnerable to flattery and influence, including by foreigners, as well as to sycophancy by subordinates, instead of encouraging honest advice. Together with his financial self-interest and fear of being held accountable for his crimes, Trump’s narcissism precluded him from being able to accept his loss of the 2020 presidential election and to promote lies and conspiracy theories that he had won, much as he lies and spreads falsehoods on many subjects. He not only refuses to disclose publicly his tax returns, but his health records and to submit to a thorough cognitive evaluation. In addition to his civil liabilities, Trump’s poor character has been proven by his convicted of election fraud for using campaign expenses to hide adultery from the public, the recommendation of the Special Counsel for impeachment for obstruction of justice of his probe into Russian election interference, his impeachment by the House of Representatives twice, his indictment in federal and state courts for trying to overturn the election, and his indictment for stealing federal records (including classified top-secret documents). In office, he pardoned criminals based on their political support of him, and has promised to pardon those complicit in the bloody January 6th Insurrection he incited, while he again refuses to accept the true result of the election if it were not favorable to him and his ego and personal self-interest. Trump’s character proves he is unable to place America’s interests above his own. He is unworthy to command anyone, let alone to serve as Commander in Chief. Trump is unworthy of any trust, let alone the highest trust in the land.

Republicans and Conservatives Unite Against Donald Trump and Trumpism

Millions of Republicans and conservatives, including many prominent leaders, opposed Donald Trump’s candidacy for President of the United States in 2016 and 2020, but the list is growing for the 2024 presidential election, including several senior officials from his own Administration and his own-recommended Vice President. Because the list of prominent anti-Trump Republicans and conservatives would be far too long for a post, this post is primarily about those who have been the most active in opposing Trump’s 2024 candidacy and Trumpism (a populist mix of protectionism, isolationism and nativism, none of which are conservative). There are dozens of prominent Republicans and conservatives who have endorsed and who are campaigning for the Democratic presidential and vice presidential ticket. A Republicans for Harris committee was formed from among prominent former Republican members of Congress or congressional staff and former Trump Administration staff, several of whom spoke at the Democratic National Convention. The Democratic presidential nominee has promised to appoint a Republican to her cabinet if she were elected, restoring a custom of appointing a member of the opposite major political party that had ended with Trump. There was an open letter written by a conservative Republican former federal judge and signed by 11 Republican lawyers who served in senior positions in Republican presidential administrations against Trump’s reelection. They write that he threatens representative government and the rule of law, express particular concern about the threat from the plans by his supporters to replace career public servants with those loyal only to Trump, and that he is “unfit, dangerous and detached from reality.” An open letter was signed by 238 anti-Trump Republican ex-staffers of the administration or campaign President Geroge W. Bush, and the offices or campaigns of the late Senator John McCain of Arizona and Senator Mitt Romney of Utah, joined by 5 former staff members from President George H.W. Bush, which was up from 150 in 2020. They cited exit polling from battleground States that proved that conservative and Republican voters were responsible for the loss by the GOP and Trump-Pence Electors in the 2020 General Election. The anti-Trump signers wrote that Trump had led an insurrection based on his lies to try to overturn the election and would jeopardize representative government while he kowtows to Russia’s tyrant, Vladimir Putin, while turning his back on allies. Over 100 ex-Republican members of Congress and security officials from the Reagan, George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush and Trump Administrations signed an open letter opposing Trump’s election. The security officials said, "We firmly oppose the election of Donald Trump. As President, he promoted daily chaos in government, praised our enemies and undermined our allies, politicized the military and disparaged our veterans, prioritized his personal interest above American interests, and betrayed our values, democracy, and this country's founding documents.” “By inciting the violent attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021 and defending those who committed it, he has violated his oath of office and brought danger to our country,” they write, before quoting Trump’s conservative former Vice President, Mike Pence, who has said that "anyone who puts himself over the Constitution should never be president of the United States.” Trump’s candidacy is opposed by former Republican Vice President Richard Cheney and his daughter, Liz Cheney, former U.S. Representative and House Republican Caucus Chairman Liz Cheney. The former conservative U.S. Representative, Defense Secretary and Vice President said that “there has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our Republic than Donald Trump.” Including Cheney, every previous living Republican presidential or vice-presidential nominee is not voting for the Republican or Trump Electors. Former President George W. Bush, Senator Mitt Romney of Utah, former Speaker of the House of Representatives Paul Ryan, and former Vice President Mike Pence do not support Trump’s candidacy. Some of them are among the growing group who had supported Trump previously, such as former U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez under President George W. Bush, Former Republican U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania Pat Toomey and the conservative editorial board of the Wall Street Journal, who are not supporting him this election. These prominent Republicans and conservatives are either voting for the Democratic Electors or writing in the names of other Republicans. By opposing Trump and Trumpism, these patriots are thus continuing to stand for the conservative and GOP principles of good character, equality, liberty, representative government, the rule of law, free trade, a strong defense, and American leadership in the world.

Conservative Thoughts on Whether Donald Trump is Fascist or Fascistic

There has been a renewed reasonable debate about whether Donald Trump is a fascist, after more than one of the senior Generals who served under him has labelled him as such. There is certainly a reasonable basis for the label and for a concern about the threat to liberty and representative government Trump and Trumpism poses. The main aspect of fascism Trump shares is his authoritarianism. He not only lacks any understanding or respect for constitutional principles and the rule of law, but admires foreign dictators and tyrants across the political spectrum. Other fascist aspects manifested by Trump are his ostensible hyper-patriotism, militarism (although he is isolationist and in favor of appeasing aggression, such as Russian aggression against Ukraine), and bigotry against various non-Whites. Another trait that is characteristic of fascist leaders is his populism —to the point of scapegoating and demagoguery. But the word I think may be more fitting for Trump than fascist is fascistic. The reason is not to minimize his dangerous proclivities, but because otherwise it would give him too much intellectual credit. As his conservative former National Security Advisor observes, Trump lacks the education and intellect to read about or understand fascism fully, let alone to accept it and to be able to articulate any coherent ideology. In a similar way, I would not say for certain that Trump is racist, despite his bigotry and belief in racial and ethnic stereotypes, because he lacks the understanding of the pseudoscientific theory of racism. Moreover, his narcissism prevails, as he effusively praises anyone who praises him and harshly criticizes anyone who criticizes him, no matter their racial or ethnic background. This narcissism is a trait that makes him vulnerable to manipulation through flattery and encourages him to seek only sycophants in subordinates, instead of honest advisors. What is more important to recognize about whether Trump is literally a fascist or not, is the clear threat he poses to liberty and representative government because of his lack of education and intellect, his bigotry, his authoritarianism and admiration for foreign authoritarians, and his general lack of principles.

Donald Trump Is Not Pro-Life

Although Donald Trump is moderately anti-abortion, he is not pro-innocent life. I have posted about how he weakened the pro-life language and policies of the 2024 Republican Platform and his favorability of allowing States to choose not to protect the right to life. But I have also noted his broader anti-innocent life positions and policies. He sent refugees fleeing for their lives to their deaths by deporting them and condemned others to being murdered by foreigners because he blocked them from being able to flee tyranny and terrorism. Trump even pardoned a war criminal who had murdered innocent civilians, and he praised the policy of the former Filipino President of encouraging murder, which included innocent victims. I have also observed how his policies have sometimes shown careless disregard for innocent human life, such as how his Muslim travel ban barred entry by organ donors, that he deported immigrants who faced death as a result, and that his minimization of the threat of the deadly Coronavirus 2019 Pandemic cost many lives. Pope Francis recently identified Trump as not pro-innocent life because of how the Republican presidential nominee wants to kill refugees. The leading liberal pro-life group, Democrats for Life, makes the same argument that I have been making that not only is Trump not pro-life, but that he undermines the pro-life movement. I have posted how he taints the pro-life movement with his misogyny, instead of it being seen as about love of every human being, and authoritarianism, instead of being seen as about freedom. They note the legal arguments in the courts were the focus, which, although necessary, were emphasized more than convincing women to keep their babies. As with conservatism in general, the pro-life movement would be best served by jettisoning Trump and renewing its commitment to love and liberty as the foundation of its advocacy for the right to life.

Russian Interference in Pennsylvania to Help Elect Donald Trump Again

The United States intelligence community found that a video circulated widely on the Internet that purports to show the destruction of ballots cast for the presidential Electors for Donald Trump being destroyed and those of his Democratic opponent being accepted for counting in Bucks County, Pennsylvania. The fake video is the latest in a series generated by the Russians to help Trump, divide Americans and undermine confidence in elections. Others smeared the Democratic Presidential and Vice Presidential nominees. The Philadelphia suburban County of Bucks is the largest swing (i.e. between Republicans or Democrats) County in the largest swing State in the American Union. I had posted recently about various Russian efforts to interfere in American politics and the 2024 presidential elections, particularly again to help elect Trump, as the successfully Russians did in 2016 and again tried to in 2020, including setting up a purported rightwing Trumpist media outlet that fed stories to journalists who were duped by obvious pro-Russian content and who had failed to question the sources of the outlet’s funding. Russian tyrant Vladimir Putin, a former Soviet intelligence officer, often interferes in Western politics and elections to promote its image and nefarious policies and undermine the image of those who oppose its aggression and other machinations, sow division to weaken the West, and to undermine confidence in elections and in the truth. The Bucks County example shows how sophisticated the Russians have been at micro-targeting their message that some on the far right, like on the far left, are more than willing to believe.

Foreign Digest: Moldova, Venezuela, Austria and Georgia

Moldova: The pro-European Union membership referendum won in Moldova last weekend. The pro-Western President leads the presidential election, but is short of a majority and will face a runoff in November, as expected. The European Union cited an unprecedented degree of Russian interference in the vote in the former Soviet Republic against both the referendum and the President. Russia has long maintained troops in a breakaway part of the former Soviet Republic inhabited by Russian speakers on the border with Ukraine. Austria: A far-right party won 29% of the vote in the Austrian parliamentary elections earlier late last month. Because no other party, including the main conservative (center-right) party, was willing to enter into a coalition government with the far-right, the President has given a mandate to the leader of the conservatives, the current Chancellor whose party earned the second-highest total of votes, to form a government. The developments in Austria are like what I posted about recently in France, where a center-right-led Government blocked both the far right and the far left from power. The election defeat by conservatives of the far-right in Poland was the first example of a resurgent center-right versus the anti-migrant, authoritarian and often pro-Russian far-right. Venezuela: The conservative Venezuelan opposition leader, Maria Corina Machado, and the presidential candidate Edmundo Gonzalez Urrutia won the Sakharov Award. The prestigious award was named after the Soviet nuclear scientist and dissident. The former ambassador Gonzalez won the most votes in the Venezuelan presidential elections in July, but the ruling Socialist dictatorship declared itself the winner, despite the abundant documentary evidence to the contrary from the precincts, in results that have not gained widespread international acceptance. Venezuela’s Socialists have ruled the South American State for 25 years, after winning an election and then becoming increasingly authoritarian, persecuting the opposition and not permitting freedom of expression or free and fair elections. Millions of Venezuelans have fled in the largest mass exodus in history. Georgia: The increasingly authoritarian and pro-Russian ruling party claimed victory in Georgia’s parliamentary elections yesterday, but several groups of European election observers, including from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, have cited hatred, intimidation and pressure, and a lack of impartiality of election officials in undermining confidence in the results. The Georgian opposition maintains the election results are being stolen. The opposition and the pro-Western President and have cited Russian interference and vote buying, while the ruling party parroted Russian propaganda and disinformation. Russia had invaded the former Soviet Republic in 2008, seizing territory and setting up puppet states, and then encroaching further onto Georgian territory and refusing to leave. The Georgian Constitution requires Georgia to pursue membership in the European Union, a goal which the Georgian Government claims to support, but which it undermines with authoritarianism, particularly the Russian-style “foreign agents” law that criminalizes media and organizations that accept foreign funding. The EU has expressed skepticism of the election results. Georgia’s Constitution also requires pursuit of membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the defensive pact led by the United States. Most Georgians prefer to be integrated into Europe, instead of under Russian dominance.

Common Media Errors, That WMD Were Not Found in Iraq, the Trump Campaign Did Not Collude with the Russians, and Refugees Enter America Illegally

There are three factual matters or sets of matters that the professional American media consistently reports erroneously, or at least misleadingly, which I shall address in this, my 1,500th post, in chronological order. Thousands of Chemical Weapons of Mass Destruction Found in Iraq: The first is that no weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) were found in Iraq after its liberation from the Baathist regime of Saddam Hussein in 2003 by an international coalition led by the United States, or at least that the ones that were found were not a threat. This error is false and would have been irrelevant anyway because Baathist Iraq was under United Nations resolutions to account for its weapons, which the Security Council found unanimously it had violated, thus enabling its tyrant to threaten his neighbors and American troops. The chemical WMDs the United Nations inspectors knew about and described as a “small but significant” amount of WMDs were found, plus other chemical WMDS that were not known, for a total of thousands of chemical WMDs. Although no “stockpiles” of such weapons were found, they were scattered amidst conventional weapons thus making Iraq in a sense more dangerous than thought, not less. Although no new WMDs were found, these chemical WMDs continued to be dangerous enough to sicken American and coalition troops who handled them for disposal. In addition, tons of U.N.-banned chemicals to make more chemical WMDs were found. A related media error in regard to Baathist Iraq was that the Liberation of Iraq was unrelated to the War on Terrorism because of a lack of an alliance between Iraq an al-Qaeda, the Islamist terrorist organization responsible for the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks on America that sparked the War on Terrorism. Although Iraq was not complicit in the attacks, it sponsored other terrorists, harboring and financing them, including some who had targeted and killed Americans. Moreover, two of al-Qaeda’s motivations were opposition to the presence of American troops in Saudi Arabia, who were present to defend the Kingdom against an invasion by serial aggressor Iraq, and the U.S.-led economic embargo against Iraq. Al-Qaeda and other terrorists recognized Iraq as a battlefield in the War on Terrorism, where they were defeated. The conventional and WMD threat from a brutal tyrant with a history of aggression and its nexus with terrorism made Iraq a serious regional threat. Today, Iraq is an ally of the U.S. in the War on Terrorism. The Special Counsel Found Collusion Between the 2016 Trump Campaign and a Russian Cutout: The second media error is that U.S. Special Counsel, Robert Mueller, a Republican former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, found that there was no “collusion” between Donald Trump’s 2016 Presidential Campaign and Russia, or at least that he did not find evidence of collusion. This media error is misleading because it absolves Russia of its complicity with its cutout, which it chose to mask its direct complicity, as well minimizes the much broader Russian election interference by focusing only on direct conspiracy. The Special Counsel explained that collusion was not a word used in federal criminal law and that he was charged only with investigating crimes. Because he did not use that word, Trump and his supporters claimed exoneration and the media’s repetition of the lack of finding of “collusion” is misleading. The Special Counsel found there was no criminal conspiracy between the Trump Campaign and Russian agents, but found there was coordination with the Russian’s cutout, Wikileaks, to whom the Russians had given the information they had stolen, knowing it would be published. Wikileaks, which is operated by an Australian, published the information the Russians had stolen. The Trump campaign they coordinated its campaign messaging with advanced knowledge from Wikileaks as to what it would publish. Thus, the Russians and Trump had thus colluded in the common parlance meaning of the word, if not the federal criminal statutory meaning. Moreover, the Special Counsel found that this interference was only one part of Russia’s “sweeping and systematic” attempt to influence American politics and the presidential elections, including by backing Donald Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016 in both the Republican Primaries and the General Election. Several Russians were charged by grand juries because of the Special Counsel’s prosecution. In one of many examples of Russian interference and the Trump campaign’s willingness to accept it, Trump had publicly invited the Russians to steal certain information from his opponent, which they began to do minutes afterward. Furthermore, the Special Counsel found that Trump, his henchman and the Russians had obstructed his criminal probe, for which he recommended Congress impeach Trump. Special Counsel Mueller’s report was validated by the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee. Refugees Do Not Enter America Illegally: The media often refer to undocumented migrants, particularly refugees claiming asylum, as having entered America illegally. Refugees are not only permitted by United States law to set foot on American soil to claim asylum from persecution, but are required to claim it on American soil, which they are permitted to reach wherever they can when fleeing for their lives or liberty. Refugees do not have visas and passports because they are fleeing dictatorships (some of which fear a loss of their population if they granted such documents), war, terrorism, crime or disasters. If an immigration judge rules that undocumented migrants’ fear of persecution is credible, then they did not enter illegally, but legally and are legally permitted to remain on American soil. It should be noted that U.S. immigration law has been so restrictive, that asylum is the main legal pathway to entering America, as the restrictiveness incentivizes irregular migration, both legal and illegal.

Foreign Digest: Germany, Italy, Bolivia, Cuba and Moldova

Germany: A former East German secret policeman was convicted in Germany for murdering a Pole who was fleeing the Communist Soviet satellite State in 1974, the first homicide conviction for a former secret policeman. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison. Italy: The rightwing Italian Parliament approved a law to make surrogate motherhood a universal crime, meaning that it would be illegal for Italians to obtain one abroad or to have one obtained abroad be recognized legally. Surrogacy was already illegal domestically in Italy, as is the law in many other Western European States. The rightwing Italian Government had proposed making the ban universal, which its allies in the national legislature approved, thereby making Italy’s surrogacy prohibition the strictest in the West. The Catholic Bishop of Rome (the Pope), the Italian Bishops Conference, Italian pro-life organizations and an international convention of doctors have decried the practice as commoditizing and thus objectifying women, in a practice described as “womb-renting.” Concerns have also been raised about the anti-family aspect of surrogacy, especially as a loophole around the ban on adoptions for homosexual couples, although the practice is committed 90% of the time by heterosexual couples. Italy has been trying to increase natality to reverse a drop of its birth rate that, along with the Covid19 pandemic and outmigration by university graduates, has caused the population to decline, despite an increase in migrants and a higher birth rate among migrants and their descendants. Bolivia: Former Bolivian President Janine Anez was cleared of criminal charges for a coup d’etat by a Bolivian Court last week for having ascended to the presidency in 2019 after the leftwing President of Bolivia, Evo Morales, was forced from power by a popular uprising after seeking an unconstitutional fourth term. The increasingly authoritarian leftist had completed a third term, even though the Bolivian Constitution allows only two and a referendum to eliminate the two-term limit was defeated. The conservative Anez, who was succeeded by a leftist ally of Morales who was elected to office in 2020, remains jailed on other political charges, however. The current President and Morales have split as Morales has been seeking to return to power. Cuba: The total collapse of the Cuban electricity grid since Friday has led to protests today on the Communist-ruled Caribbean island-state. Cuba’s Communists have ruled brutally since 1959 and have been intolerant of freedom of expression, including the freedom of speech and of peaceful assembly, which makes mass protests like today’s uncommon. Moldova: Moldovans have been voting today in presidential elections and on a referendum for a constitutional amendment to include adhesion to the European Union expressly in Moldova’s Constitution. In the presidential election, the pro-Western President is being challenged by a pro-Russian Socialist and other candidates. If no one reaches majority of the vote, as second vote will be held on November 3, as expected. There is a significant Russian-speaking minority in the former Soviet Republic, especially in breakaway Transnistria, next to the border with Ukraine, where Russian stations troops, against Moldova’s wishes. Moldova accuses Russia of interference in its affairs. It has arrested hundreds for vote buying.

Celebrate Columbus Day for Spreading Christianity and Western Civilization to the New World

As I do every year, I post on Columbus Day (October 12, the anniversary of the Discovery of the Americas by Christopher Columbus in 1492 on behalf of Spain) or on the legal federal and state holiday that commemorate the discovery and explain why it is worthy to celebrate the greatest event in human history. I have explained that Columbus’ scientific discovery of a western an oceanic route to the New World from the Old World, which was based on his keen observations that led him to theorize correctly that a large land mass inhabited by Asiatic people existed much closer to Europe than thought, among other scientific discoveries he made, meet the definition of a discovery (an uncovering), even though others had arrived first, namely the Indigenous Americans who came across the land bridge from Asia during the Ice Age. I have noted how Columbus’ great navigational skills, unlike the discoveries by other Europeans before him of the Americas, bridged the two worlds permanently by lifting the cover of the Atlantic Ocean that had hidden the two Hemispheres of the world from each other for millions of years. I have observed how some nativist bigots in America, like the Ku Klux Klan, who hate Southern Europeans and Catholics, had sought to minimize the achievement of Columbus by promoting the Leif Ericson legend and that Columbus Day was thus intended as a day to appreciate the contributions of immigrants and refugees to America. But this year, with a controversy among Latin American leaders about the legacy of Columbus, I note the Genoese navigator brought Christianity and Western European Civilization to the Western Hemisphere. Although some of the Indigenous Americans had already been civilized and had remarkable accomplishments, and others not civilized, they all lacked knowledge of God and the Judeo-Christian beliefs of a rational universe created by God and of equality among all human beings created in His likeness. These beliefs were developed through Western Civilization, which itself was influenced by Greco-Roman civilization, forming the basis for modern science, liberty and representative government, among other contributions to mankind. These beliefs led Columbus and the Spanish to save Indigenous American tribes from victimization by other Indigenous tribes from the most vicious cannibalism or massive human sacrifice ever known in the world by abolishing these atrocious practices, among other terrible practices in the Americas before European contact, including slavery and genocide. Despite atrocities and abuses committed by some of the Western Europeans themselves against some of the Indigenous Americans, the contributions of Christianity and Western Civilization ought not to be minimized and cannot reasonably be dismissed based particularly upon multiculturalist ideas that themselves were brought from the West. It is worthy to appreciate the cultures of Indigenous Peoples, but not necessary or appropriate to acknowledge their contributions by exaggerating their accomplishments or ignoring their culture’s faults, or by denigrating the Faith and the cultural contributions of Westerners, no matter the human faults of the purveyors of Christianity and Western Civilization, as many on the Left do who do not appreciate Christianity or Western Civilization. To celebrate Columbus Day is not only to celebrate the rejoining of the two Hemispheres and the reuniting of the separated members of the human family who inhabited them, but nothing less than to celebrate the spread of the Good News of Christ and the ideals and benefits of Western Civilization, which has brought great improvements to the entire world.