A major election reform was
approved by the Republican-led Pennsylvania General Assembly and signed into
law by the Democratic Governor late last month.
As a bipartisan compromise in which the major parties try to use the law
to advantage themselves, it is of mixed result in terms of representative
government, but is overall a good reform.
The reform bans the straight-party
ballot option, whereby a box can be checked or a button pushed to vote for all
of a party’s nominees at once instead of choosing each individually, making
yesterday’s General Election the last to allow this option. Only eight other States in the American Union
have such an option. It is more
representative for candidates to earn individual votes through the serious
consideration of electors instead of through excessive partisanship, or the
encouragement of laziness and ignorance.
Democrats, who are more reliant on the straight party option in areas
with less educated or responsible voters, opposed this reform that was insisted
upon by Republicans.
Other reforms include the extension
of the voter registration deadline from 30 to 15 days before the election and
the deadline to return absentee ballots to 8:00 PM on Election Day, instead of
5:00 PM the Friday before, which was the earliest deadline in the American
Union. These reforms were not
controversial.
The election reform bill also
allows no-excuse absentee ballots, instead of for disability or absence from
the municipality, which, although it would make voting more convenient for some,
will make it easier than it already is for voters to be unduly influenced by
others, especially considering that Pennsylvania is one of the States that
permit the mentally incapacitated to vote, or to vote under the influence of
alcohol or drugs. Therefore, unlike the
other parts of the election reform, this measure, which was advanced by
Democrats, weakens representative government.
Opening primary elections to participation to all voters, or at least
those who are registered non-partisan, which was an idea that had some support
in the Legislature, was not part of the election reform. Although party
members should choose their own candidates, because primary elections are
funded by the taxpayers, instead of by the parties themselves, some Pennsylvania voters
argued they should have a choice in whose names appear on the ballot, as
nominations are often effectively determinative of the general election outcome. A better idea would be not to have names
printed on the ballot at all, as was the practice in the early Republic. The parties, especially the major parties,
who have given themselves easier ballot access requirements through legislation,
would thus not have the force of law to advantage themselves, and the taxpayers
would not be funding their (major) party primaries. There has also been no effort to expand voter
identification requirements beyond first-time voters to prevent voter
impersonation. Reform for federal and
state legislative redistricting is being addressed separately.
The election reform law also authorizes
the borrowing of $90 million for helping Pennsylvania’s
67 Counties to upgrade their voting machines to ones that are less vulnerable
to hacking by having paper backup and being auditable, as per federal
recommendation because of Russian hacking into state and some county election
systems in 2016. As I had noted after
its passage, the budget approved earlier this year authorizes the spending, but
specific legislation is necessary to effectuate the fiscal blueprint. The Commonwealth has received $14 billion in
federal funds for the upgrade, as the hacking is a foreign attack on the United States. Counties in Pennsylvania are responsible for conducting
elections. Some Counties have already
upgraded to the new voting machines, but the upgrade would have been
financially burdensome for poorer counties.
There are many other election
reforms Pennsylvania
should consider, but the elimination of the straight party option was necessary
and improving election security was essential.