I was quoted as a historian in yesterday’s article in the Reading Eagle on a proposal to remove
the Christopher Columbus monument from Reading’s City Park: https://www.readingeagle.com/news/local/reading-resident-wants-christopher-columbus-statue-removed-from-city-park/article_40f5818a-b724-11ea-94fb-af2e95792b60.html.
I noted Columbus ’ accomplishment
of joining two worlds together and its significance of exchanging goods, ideas
and knowledge and providing the opportunity for friendship and that the
monument was intended to affirm the equality of immigrants who have faced prejudice,
not for events that took place later for which the discovery is blamed. Indeed, the article notes how xenophobic
nativists protested the monument when it was placed in 1925, paid for by local
Italian-Americans and sculpted by an Italian artist. The upkeep up the statue has been performed
by the Columbus Day Committee, which is made up of Holy Rosary Roman Catholic
Parish (an Italian national church), whose Pastor founded it in 1956, and other
Italian organizations.
As I have
noted in posts every year on Columbus Day, but was only implicit in the article
because of space limitations, Columbus truly did discover the Western
Hemisphere, as one need not be the first to uncover something to be credited
with its discovery, which thus does not slight the Native Americans who first
crossed the land bridge with Asia during the Ice Age. His observations that led him to theorize
that an inhabited landmass inhabited by Asiatic people were nearer to Europe than known.
Although Columbus was incorrect that it
meant the world was smaller and that Asia was closer, his primary scientific
theory was correct that there was an inhabited landmass inhabited by Asiatic
people closer to the Eastern Hemisphere , which
he accomplished with only a clock and a compass. He is also credited with the scientific
discoveries that the Northern and north magnetic poles are not in the same
location and that the Earth is not perfectly spherical. Columbus ’ outstanding
skills as a navigator allowed him not only to reach the New World, but to
bridge the two hemispheres permanently, as no one had previously done, as he
was able to sail back to his home port and return to the New
World .
Ferdinand
and Isabella of Spain financed Columbus ’
expedition with the goal of trade and spreading the Faith, which was Spanish
national policy. Columbus was also motivated by commerce and
regarded spreading Christianity as his mission.
When he made contact with the Native Americans, the aboriginal peoples
of the Western Hemisphere reacted either
peacefully, or by running away or in a hostile manner, to which Columbus and
his Spanish crew did not react. He
ordered his crew not to harm the friendly Natives or to exploit sexually their women,
who did not wear clothing. Columbus founded a colony on the island of Hispaniola ,
but when he returned on his second voyage, he found its inhabitants had all
been slaughtered. His critics judge him
harshly by present standards and blame his discovery for all of the diseases
that were exchanged, as happens whenever there is contact between two peoples
when one of them does not have immunity, and for cruelties inflicted by the
Spanish, which were against the wishes of Isabella. Columbus’ critics credulously believe all of
the allegations that his Spanish rivals in the New World later made against
him, without any appreciation of the arrival of Western Civilization and
Christianity to the Western Hemisphere and the ideals that developed more fully
from them of equality and liberty, among the many benefits of the reuniting of
the two worlds, in contradiction of the critics’ claim of tolerance of cultures
and blaming of the discovery for the diminishment of Native American culture in
some places. It is typical when two
cultures come into contact that the more technologically advanced culture
dominates, as the less advanced culture adopts much or all of the more advanced
culture while anything regarded as worthy of conservation is retained and
perhaps even picked up by the more advanced culture. In accusing Columbus of “genocide” because of
disease and because some of the Native tribes lost military conflicts with the
Spanish and because of the cruelties, these critics also ignore how the
European migrants to America rescued certain Native tribes from genocide by
other tribes from cannibalism or human sacrifice. As I have posted before, commemorating Columbus does not denigrate Native Americans, who are
properly honored by the United States
at Thanksgiving for their friendship with the English settlers at Plymouth . The accomplishments of Native American
culture and the contributions of the many millions of Native Americans
throughout the Western Hemisphere ought to be appreciated throughout the Americas .
As I have noted in previous posts,
the effort to commemorate Columbus Day as a federal holiday was led by an
Irish-American Priest who had founded the Knights of Columbus, a Catholic
fraternal organization, to refute the advancement of the Leif Erikson legend to
minimize Columbus’ accomplishments, by the Ku Klux Klan and other Nativists who
are prejudiced against Catholics and Southern and Eastern Europeans. The minimization of Columbus ’ accomplishments is based upon
negative stereotypes about such people and Italians particularly and furthers
those stereotypes. For example, the
claims that Columbus ’
discovery was accidental or that he was “lost” invoke the stereotype of
Italians as less intelligent than Northern Europeans. The point that America would not have come to
its present existence but for its discovery by Southern European Catholics was
intended to acknowledge the contributions of all immigrants and to welcome
them, based on the American Creed, the foundational belief of America which holds that because all human beings are created in the image and likeness of
God, they are equally free and independent.