The deposing of Egyptian President
Muhammad Morsi by Egypt ’s
army was obviously a military coup d’etat, notwithstanding the fact that it was
demanded by a broad-based opposition and that it was popular. United States President Barack Obama has
declared, however, that the removal of the Muslim Brotherhood-led government
from power was not a military coup. A
finding that it had been would have barred the continuation of American
military aid to Egypt .
There is nothing wrong with a coup
that removes a democratically-elected government that had usurped its power, as
long as the coup leaders restore civilian, representative government that
protects liberty as soon as possible.
The point is that it was wrong of liberals to criticize former President
George W. Bush for not opposing a coup that temporarily removed Hugo Chavez
from power in Venezuela and
for President Bill Clinton to restore Jean-Bertrand Aristide to power in Haiti , both of
whom were democratically-elected presidents who gradually became dictators. Liberals were also wrong to oppose the
popular removal by the legislative and judicial branches of the Honduran government
of the country’s president, who was a Chavez ally who had attempted to extend
his rule, in violation of the constitution of Honduras, just as the Left was
wrong to oppose the popular 1973 coup supported by most Chilean institutions
that removed the Marxist Salvador Allende from power in Chile. In contrast to Egypt , the Obama Administration
denounced the Honduran coup and sanctioned and ostracized the government that
restored representative republican rule.
As I have posted in regard to all
of these examples, liberals must learn that the manner of choosing a
government, or even the type of government, is not as important as the manner
in which it rules, specifically, whether it respects civil rights. They would profit from studying especially
the examples of two infamous democratically-elected regimes, namely Napoleon
Bonaparte’s French Empire and Nazi Germany.
The Obama Administration should be
honest and consistent and call the Egyptian military coup what it is and
instead ask Congress for the power to repeal the law prohibiting military aid
to regimes that come to power by a military putsch, or at least the power to
waive such a rule under certain circumstances, such as when a military coup
restores liberty. Even better, it ought
to applaud the Egyptians for removing an authoritarian Islamist government that
had disappointed the people it had oppressed, while encouraging freedom for
all.
No comments:
Post a Comment