Last week, I delivered a speech to the Reading School Board
of Directors. It was the first time I had
addressed the Board, other than at a public hearing, since shortly after my
term as a School Director ended in 2013.
I
congratulated the Board President for being elevated by her colleagues to the
presidency, which I took as a validation of the work that she, I and others on
the previous Board did to balance the School District ’s
budget, under difficult circumstances, without raising taxes, while producing
millions of dollars in surplus. I
praised and thanked the current Board for continuing the previous Board’s
practice, which had been my suggestion, to have metal detectors at Board
meetings for the safety of the public. I
also praised the new Board for continuing two successful projects initiated by
prior Boards: the under-budget renovation of the Amanda Stoudt elementary school
and thanked the Board for planning a meeting there for the public to see the
renovations and additions, and the repair of the Hampden Park Comfort Station,
which had fallen into such disrepair as to be a danger to the public, as well
as an eyesore, and noted also its improved security.
However, I observed several areas,
in contrast, where the current Board had failed to make progress or had even
regressed. I noted that the new Board
has ignored a number of facilities resolutions approved by the previous Board,
numerous suggestions for cutting wasteful spending or improving the collection
of revenue that I urged it to consider, a recommendation by the Finance
Committee to issue requests for proposals for professional services in order to
increase openness and transparency and act in the best financial interest of
the District, and the recommendation of the District’s auditor and the
Pennsylvania Auditor General to have an “Audit” or “Financial Review Committee”
to increase openness and transparency and improve the District’s financial
controls.
Finally, noting the criticism of
the Auditor General of a prior Board in 2011 for failing its fiduciary
responsibility to the taxpayers by being “too trusting” of administrators, I expressed
my deep concern that the majority of the current Board was also too trusting of
administrators, whom I noted are not perfect or all-knowing and usually are not
from the District. I urged the Board to
conduct proper oversight by asking questions in order to hold the
Administration accountable. Noting how
several of the School Directors on the Board shared my concern, I suggested the
way to afford Directors the opportunity to learn what is happening in the
District and to ask questions was to return to the practice of having board
committees.
I warned that the majority of the
current Board’s failure to conduct proper oversight would result in it, too,
failing its fiduciary responsibility to the taxpayers.