Elections in Venezuela
and Russia
are being boycotted by the democratic opposition of each country, as the
elections in both states are not free and fair.
The
Socialist dictatorship of Venezuela
has invited international observers to monitor upcoming elections for its
newly-created national legislature, but the invitation is a propaganda ploy to
make the regime seem legitimate, as the opposition is boycotting the vote. The dictatorship had created the new
legislature, which supplanted the Congress, using a special constitutional
provision, after the democratic opposition had won a congressional
supermajority, despite the violations of liberty by the authoritarian
regime. The new legislature is partly
appointed and has seats reserved for regime-backed constituencies. Elections in Venezuela are not free and fair
because of the lack of freedom overall and because regime opponents are
persecuted or prohibited from taking their seats.
In Russia , seven candidates for President of the Russian Federation
have been permitted to stand for election in March against tyrant Vladimir
Putin, but the candidacy of the main opposition leader, Alexei Navalny, is
prohibited, even though he had obtained the requisite signatures. The democratic opposition to the
authoritarian regime is boycotting the election. Only regime-approved candidates or token
opponents are ever permitted run for president.
Elections are also not free and fair in Russia because election campaigns
do not take place in freedom, as the freedoms of speech, peaceful assembly and
the press are curtailed.
The
Venezuelan and Russian regimes were originally elected democratically, but
became increasingly authoritarian. The
Venezuelan and Russian people are no longer free. Authoritarian regimes in general, but
especially those originally elected democratically, use elections as a pretense
to make their regimes seem legitimate.
Because despots are afraid of being held accountable and losing power
through popular elections, however, authoritarian regimes rig elections by
various means in order to guarantee the outcome of the regime retaining
power. The despot then uses the pretense
of the popular will in order to quash dissent even further.
Therefore, free countries ought not
legitimize authoritarian regimes by recognizing the outcomes of undemocratic
elections and must instead insist on free and fair elections.
No comments:
Post a Comment