As I do every year, I post to urge
the replacement of “Presidents’ Day” as an American holiday with “Washington’s
Birthday” and to recall the greatness of George Washington as an example to
follow. Sometimes I post on the holiday,
like today, and other times on Washington ’s
February 22 birthday, depending on the circumstances.
This year, it is encouraging that there
has been more discussion than usual by historians and others recalling the
historic origins of the federal and state holiday that the day was intended to
honor Washington, and secondarily Abraham Lincoln at most, not all the other
Presidents of the United States. The
federal holiday of “Washington’s Birthday,” which remains its legal name, was
intended to honor Washington for all his achievements, including as the General
who led the Continental Army during the American Revolution, as a Founding
Father, and other contributions to the early Republic, in addition to his great
presidency. Most States in the Union
call their holiday “Presidents’ Day” or something similar, without mentioning Washington . Furthermore, the federal and coincidental
state holidays are never celebrated on February 22.
It has thus become the popular
custom to refer to the holiday as “Presidents’ Day,” though often lacking the
apostrophe or with it placed incorrectly, with a corresponding focus on all of
the federal Chief Executives, including those who were scoundrels. This custom minimizes the greatness of
Washington and promotes the cult of the presidency and the elevation of the
prestige of the Executive Branch over the two other co-equal Branches of
Government and thus the system of checks and balances as part of the
constitutional doctrine of the Separation of Powers, something to which the
First American President would have objected.
With the trend toward States requiring more civics
education that I have posted in support of, I hope that more study of George
Washington will be included as an example of how to live out American
principles of self-government and representative republicanism.
No comments:
Post a Comment