The Democrats have been praising
the economic and fiscal policies of former President George W. Bush, albeit
tacitly, especially during the 2012 presidential campaign.
First, the Democrats at their
convention recently compared the “Obama recovery” to the “Bush recovery.” They are thus making an acknowledgement that
there even was a Bush recovery. The
recovery was from the economic down-turn that had begun during the Clinton
Administration and that was exacerbated by the September 11 Attacks, which
resulted in a short, mild recession. The
Democrats’ comparison is also an implication that there was a period of Bush
prosperity, despite all the Democratic and liberal criticism of the economy and
of the policies of President George W. Bush and the Republican Congress. That admission had first come in 2008 when
Democrats began citing economic statistics, describing the figures as the worst
in several years, meaning that the period of several years beforehand was
necessarily prosperous.
Second, United States Vice
President Joe Biden acknowledged in the vice presidential debate with
Republican nominee Rep. Paul Ryan that the Bush income tax cuts were for the
middle class. Instead of the usual liberal
Democratic references only to the “middle class tax cuts,” as if they came from
someone other than Bush, or Bush’s “tax cuts for the wealthiest,” as if Bush
did not cut tax rates for all income taxpayers, the Vice President acknowledged
Bush’s responsibility for the popular tax cuts he referred to as the “Bush
middle class tax cuts.” Obama has
extended all of the Bush tax cuts – for both the middle class and the wealthy –
in order to avoid harming the economy during this weak economic recovery. Apparently,
liberal Democrats believe that tax cuts by Republicans cause recession, but
cause recovery when Democrats extend them.
Meanwhile, since the presidential
campaign in 2008, Barack Obama and other Democrats have complained that Bush
and the Republican-led Congress increased Medicaid by implementing a
prescription drug program without raising taxes to pay for the program. Nevertheless, the Democrats are acknowledging
that the Republicans expanded the program they have argued repeatedly
Republicans wish to destroy.
Of course, the main Democratic
praise has come not from words, but from Obama’s actions. Not only did he extend the Bush tax cuts, he submitted
two free trade agreements that Bush negotiated to the Senate for ratification,
which the Democratic-majority Senate provided.
Additionally, one could argue that Obama’s deficit spending is a
continuation of Bush’s, although Obama has increased it significantly. Apparently, liberal Democrats believe that
deficit spending by a Republican is harmful to the economy, but economically
stimulative when they do it. They have
to believe it or else they have little foundation for the central premise of
the 2012 campaign: that Bush’s policies caused the recession that the Obama
Administration has been unable to recover from sufficiently and therefore, a
return to office of Republicans and the implementation of fiscally conservative
policies like reducing spending, borrowing and taxes would be unwise.
In an upcoming post, I shall treat
in more detail on the subject of how the liberal Democrats are wrong to blame
Bush and the Republicans for the recession.
No comments:
Post a Comment